Nvidia Geforce Gtx 1650 Vs 3050
Toll now 212$ Games supported 85% Price at present no data Games supported 93% Comparison of graphics carte du jour architecture, market place segment, value for coin and other general parameters. Value for money To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. no data General operation parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base of operations clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise cess you take to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Data on GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a time to come computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards information technology's interface and double-decker (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video bill of fare is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors accept no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a rule, data in this department is precise simply for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Not-gaming benchmark performance comparing. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, experience gratuitous to speak up in comments section, nosotros ordinarily fix issues speedily. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics carte du jour a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing four dissever benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, eleven and 12 (the last being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics bill of fare with two scenes, 1 depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cavern, the other displaying a infinite fleet attack on a caught planet. Information technology was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is at present recommended to exist used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark xi is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on 2 scenes, i being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded past Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX eleven feature level ten benchmark that was used for domicile PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. But like Water ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Dark Raid. Benchmark coverage: xiv% Benchmark coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 criterion for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Criterion coverage: 14% Ice Tempest Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, function of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure out entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX eleven characteristic level nine to display a battle between two space fleets almost a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Criterion coverage: 8% Let's come across how skilful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +71% −71% −23.4% +23.iv% −52.v% +52.5% +145% −145% −80.viii% +lxxx.8% −23.5% +23.5% −25.viii% +25.8% +190% −190% −34.2% +34.2% −36.4% +36.4% +67.7% −67.seven% −29.3% +29.three% −17.9% +17.ix% +51.6% −51.6% +ix.4% −ix.4% −67.9% +67.nine% +87.1% −87.1% −42.three% +42.3% −27.4% +27.4% −24.2% +24.ii% +168% −168% −14.5% +xiv.five% −43.9% +43.9% −40% +40% −10.vii% +10.7% −36.two% +36.2% −14.9% +14.9% −18.8% +18.eight% −24% +24% −84.6% +84.6% −62.7% +62.7% −19.2% +xix.ii% −27.6% +27.6% −15.8% +15.8% +110% −110% −xiv.3% +14.3% −23.8% +23.8% +16.1% −16.ane% −xviii.9% +18.9% −76.ix% +76.9% −45% +45% −82.4% +82.4% −44.eight% +44.8% −72.ii% +72.2% −69.2% +69.2% −69.2% +69.2% +23.eight% −23.8% −33.3% +33.iii% −26.eight% +26.viii% +48.4% −48.4% −35.7% +35.7% −55% +55% −10.5% +10.v% −107% +107% −41.vii% +41.7% −nineteen.2% +xix.ii% −76.9% +76.nine% −26.9% +26.9% −138% +138% −520% +520% −66.7% +66.7% −nineteen.2% +19.2% +0% +0% −47.6% +47.6% −3.3% +3.3% −288% +288% Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile since it shows improve operation. Be enlightened that GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook one. Should you still accept questions concerning option between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments department, and we shall respond. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" button most your favorite graphics card. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 from AMD is Radeon RX 580X, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650: The nearest GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile'south AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 580 Mobile, which is faster past 2% and college by 8 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more than or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, likewise every bit charge per unit them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of i to five: Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of i to 5: Here you can enquire a question about this comparison, hold or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSGTX 1650 vs RTX 3050 Mobile
General info
Place in performance rating 190 161 Value for money 35.xl no data Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Ampere (2020−2022) GPU code proper name TU117 GN20-P0 Market segment Desktop Laptop Release date 23 April 2019 (3 years agone) 11 May 2021 (1 yr ago) Launch price (MSRP) $149 no data Electric current price $212 (1.4x MSRP) no data Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 896 2048 Core clock speed 1485 MHz 1238 MHz Boost clock speed 1665 MHz 1500 MHz Number of transistors four,700 million no data Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 8 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 75 Watt threescore Watt (35 - lxxx Watt TGP) Texture make full rate 93.24 102.0 Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size no data large Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 Length 229 mm no data Width 2-slot no data Supplementary power connectors None no data Memory
Retentivity blazon GDDR5 GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount four GB 4 GB Retentivity coach width 128 Bit 128 Bit Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 12000 MHz Retentivity bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 224.0 GB/due south Shared retention - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs HDMI + no data API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_2) Shader Model 6.v 6.5 OpenGL 4.half-dozen 4.6 OpenCL 1.2 2.0 Vulkan i.2.131 1.2 CUDA 7.5 8.6 Criterion functioning
Overall score
Gaming operation
Total Hard disk 70 72 1440p 39 44 4K 23 28
Depression Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Loftier Preset
Ultra Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 53 30−35 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 47 58 Battlefield 5 61 93 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 76 30−35 Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 47 Far Weep 5 68 84 Far Cry New Dawn 66 83 Forza Horizon 4 90 30−35 Hitman 3 76 102 Horizon Nothing Dawn 55 75 Red Expressionless Redemption 2 52 xxx−35 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58 75 Watch Dogs: Legion 56 66
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 47 30−35 Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 35 32 Battleground 5 53 89 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58 xxx−35 Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 37 Far Cry 5 62 79 Far Weep New Dawn 62 77 Forza Horizon 4 83 30−35 Hitman 3 62 71 Horizon Nothing Dawn 41 59 Metro Exodus 35 49 Blood-red Dead Redemption 2 28 30−35 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47 64 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 85 Lookout man Dogs: Legion 48 57
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25 30−35 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13 24 Battleground 5 51 83 Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 31 Far Cry 5 58 74 Far Cry New Dawn 57 66 Forza Horizon four 65 30−35 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42 48 Watch Dogs: Legion 21 26
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36 thirty−35 Hitman 3 37 44 Horizon Zero Dawn 26 46 Metro Exodus twenty 29 Red Expressionless Redemption 2 17 thirty−35 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29 42
Assassin's Creed Odyssey eighteen xxx−35 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13 22 Battleground 5 39 66 Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 21 Far Cry 5 39 52 Far Cry New Dawn 41 52 Forza Horizon 4 46 30−35 Spotter Dogs: Legion 14 19
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20 30−35 Hitman 3 nineteen 21 Horizon Cipher Dawn xv 30−35 Metro Exodus 12 17 Cherry-red Dead Redemption ii 24−27 thirty−35 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13 23 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 33
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 13 30−35 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5 30−35 Battlefield v 21 35 Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 30−35 Far Weep five 19 19 Far Cry New Dawn 21 xxx−35 Forza Horizon 4 30 30−35 Watch Dogs: Legion eight 30−35 Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating 26.35 xxx.76 Novelty 23 April 2019 11 May 2021 Pipelines / CUDA cores 896 2048 Memory bandwidth 128 224 Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 75 Watt threescore Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 by AMD
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile past AMD
Like GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1650-vs-GeForce-RTX-3050-mobile
0 Response to "Nvidia Geforce Gtx 1650 Vs 3050"
Post a Comment